Merchant of Venice Essay: A Comedy? :: free essay writer

To the reader, The merchandiser of Venice, may seem horrible and it be impossible to find the funniness at all. Perhaps, Shakespe atomic number 18 may have been simply pureeing to commit sight laugh at the appalling injustice we cause superstar other because of the small differences among us. Or, perhaps, he may have at first treasured the viewers of The Merchant of Venice to feel that they, the Christians, had nonhing in common with the Jew, Shylock. What on earth could the Christians have in common with a Jew? Shakespeare demonstrates that the Christians were just as hungry for silver and fortune as the Jew. Perhaps this is a waggery after all. That Shakespeare sees people, Jew or Christian, as simply people, and if he could non make people see that they were all people with common ground, then he would have to start with something he knew everyone could relate with. The best item to dumbfound to mind was money. No matter if the amount is in ducats, dollars or pesos, everyone understands this concept. Although it does not seem perfectly clear in what way Shakespeare was causeing to monger the buffoonery in this stand for, one thing is evident, Shakespeare was a man in the beginning his time. So, besides trying to find where the comedy is, maybe one should try to find where the most superficial person lies. Who is more superficial in this play? The Jew whose only business is money, or the Christians? It seems apparent that both are superficial, and one no more than the other. In the play Bassanio does not try to hide the fact that he needs to marry a adult female of riches to restore his fortune. Shylocks daughter Jessica, promises to steal jewels and fortune from her father, proving that she too is money hungry. Even Salerio and Solanio seem to talk of nothing more than riches and wealth throughout the play. So yes, they all are superficial, and one can not peg one any more than another.So again, we are back to the comedy of the whole t hing Now that I think about it, it seems unidentified that the majority of our class found no humor in this play. When one thinks of why this may be, it is simple. We do not laugh when we read this play because we have not changed. Since the time of this play, we have inched very little outside(a) from prejudice and belittling people because they are what we feel is different, therefore making them strange.