Reception of photography

re work oution of picture winningUsing a broad range of critical, satirical, and photographic texts, esteem the hea consequently reception of picture taking in the middle nineteenth century. The mid nineteenth century was a fourth dimension of great technological advancement, and a oft modern demeanor of living came to be that bought with it signifi bottom of the inningt cultural and social change. The industrial age was in full swing (as a consequence of the late(a) development of the steam engine), and photography was an exciting ( merely as well intimidating) technology that caused incredible debate surrounds its status as an maneuver row, and to a fault the ethical and social issues its conception invoked. Although Daguerre/Fox Talbots capital of Seychellesn audience were primarily a receptive and willing one ready to embrace raw(a) and exciting technology (Goldberg 1991), at that place is significant evidence that shows a mixed cultural reception in regards to the emergence of earliest photographic processes. rise up (2004 p.12) states thathai lead as a great technological invention, photography immediately became the event of debates concerning its aesthetic status and social uses Henisch (1994 pg.2) agrees stating intense controversies raged concerning its status and role in society. photography had a huge impact on the Victorian society, and in 1839 fine artist Paul Delaroche is s upkeep to take a crap claimed hysterically upon first comprehend a daguerreotype photograph, from this day painting is dead. Japanese artist Renjio Shinoke likewise reportedly snapped his paintbrushes and be gravel a pioneer of archean Japanese photography (Eastman 1962). Whilst these examples ar cl aboriginal overt exaggerations (almost to the point of satire) , they as well as laid-backlight genuine fears and anxieties matt-up by artists (especially personation) and critics alike, which stimulated and engaged the Victorian society in a plethor a of debates surrounding the cultural, ethical and social impact the emergence of photography raised . The majority accepted its faculty to record mechanically sinless images that are free of discrimination, scarce photographys status as an art form (or a creative medium) was some(prenominal) less certain, and something that was fiercely contested. Charles Baudel transmite (1821-1867), a cut Poet artist (and well kn bear and very vocal critic of early photography) wroteIf photography is allowed to deputize for art, it will non be long in the beginning it has supplanted or corrupted art altogether (Baudelaire 1859 pg.297)Baudelaire proposes photography simply should not be allowed to supplant much traditional aesthetic methods, and to allow it do so would not yet undermine, or negatively impact art, but corrupt it altogether. Baudelaire was not alone, as Goldberg (1991 pg.10) declares William Wordsworth shared in Baudelaires cynical reckon of photography, and in the 1840s penned a sonnet which differentiate the degradation of mans noblest attire, and expressed fears that a dumb art would lead his once-intellectual land back to the caves. Here Wordsworth is stipulating photographys capableness to instigate the death of human intellect, and again, whilst such arguments are certainly sensationalist, these declarations shows that not tho was there an opposition to photographys index to render art useless, but overly a fear that its mechanical disposition would dumb buck society by removing a large single out of the human tone from the creative process. Both notions show people gestated (among what we can consider high artists) that photography was a genuine threat to the ticket arts of the cartridge clip. maybe artists felt threatened by the technology? Threatened by its ability to so effortlessly paint reality, and ultimately achieve what they had been difficult to do for long? Satirical publi pations in circulation in the mid nineteent h century, of which lap magazine was the most popular, produced a number of cartoons highlighting these very issues. iodin such untitled illustration (1860 pg. 140) portrays a fashionable photographer stern smoking in his studio apartment, as he declares himself not a rough-cut artist. Clearly an underhanded attack on the attitudes photographers took to their work which wasnt shared by their critics. Another satirical sketch, titled How the Famous photographer Nadar Elevates Photography to the aim of Art show the French artist and photographer Flix Nadar taking to the sky in an air balloon, clutching a camera under his arm, physically lifting photography into the realms of high art. Such a picture of absurdity is surely meant to openly ridicule photography and its quest to be recognised as fine art. The latter picture assists a secondary purpose though, as Nadar was famous for his unsuccessful attempt to build a gigantic air balloon named Le Gant (or The Giant) around the sam e time as his photographic exploits. These are just two examples of pointion(predicate) cartoons create around the mid nineteenth century that served to ridicule not only photographys quest for a higher status, but also many criticized the photographic studios and the rising popularity of carte de visite . In the photographic studios defence, famous photographic studio owner Richard Beard ran a series of advertisements for his business that served as much to promote his business as they did to promote photography as an art form. Close scrutiny of one of his earliest advertisements (Beard 1843) circulated in 1843 reveals the words Photography is indeed as grand a step in the fine arts as the steam engine was in the mechanical arts. This isnt to secern everybody had delicatey accepting photography as true art, as many did indeed lament the skill that was required of a competent photographer, and the inseparable talent required to turn out a successful exposure. A Victorian peri odical titled in one case a Week produce in 1862 states that To produce a good photograph, it requires a thoroughly artistic hand. Francious Argo (1930), when asked by the French government to assess the daguerreotypes successes concluded that M Daguerres rattling(prenominal) discovery is an immense service rendered to art. This prompted the French government to subsidise Daguerre a pension of 6,000 francs for life, and his son 4,000 on the understanding they could use and adapt it for their own strike (Goldberg 1991). novelell states that Argos memorandum mustnt be taken as a rumination of the attitudes of all artists to the in the buff discovery. It appears that it was mainly established artists that held the biggest contempt for photography, and I believe not only suggests a fear for their livelihoods, but also a fear that the status of artist, usually reserved for a chosen few, would populate be purchasable to anyone with enough bills to purchase a camera. It is difficu lt to truly reckon just how profoundly photography affected art in these early days, but it can be certain it was in spades believed at least possible by many that photography could be a form of artistic expression. as Goldberg (1981 pg.20) states photography and art have always been tangled, are tangled still.Millions of daguerreotype portrait photographs were taken in the 1840s and 1850s (to the dread of photographys critics) as it began to supersede the more traditional painted portraitures. As Goldberg (1991 pg.12) states afterwards 1839 people who were not wealthy enough to commission portraits by a painter like Jean-Augusta-Dominique Ingres were no longer had to do with silhouettes and stiff strike hard renditions of their faces turned out by itinerant painters Portrait painters simply couldnt tag on the demand necessary, and the affordability and fast turnaround of mainly studio based daguerreotype photographers (there were also the travelling carts) could offer was simpl y impossible to match. Photographic studios were the staple of early photography, the most famous of which were the Beard chain of studios (aptly ran by Richard Beard) which began opening in capital of the United Kingdom in 1943. His studios were incredibly successful and lucrative business opportunity at the time, as the deal he do with Daguerre (who held the patent to his process) ensured his studios were the only ones in the UK throughout the early years of photography. Punch magazine (18 ran numerous satirical cartoons that highlighted what appears to be a clear distaste for the photographic studio. one cartoon named Step in, and be done sir features a cat trying to lure a mouse into a photographic studio. More an rebound of the society in which photography was operating, this piece could be looked at in a number of different ways. Perhaps the photographer being the cat (fat cat) and the enchanted lower/middle classes being the mice, echoing how the sitters are led into the studios under what could be considered false pretences in order to have their money relieved of them. Julia F Munro (2009 pg.167) statesGeorge Dodd personified the by-then popular process of photography as the optical terra incognita, and as strange, scientific, mournful, all at once. Such a figuration typifies the Victoria reaction to the uncanny qualities of the new technology.This statement was retrieved from an article entitled officious with the photograph, published on April 29th 1854, and encapsulates the mixed reactions of the Victorian public towards early photography and more importantly the photographic studio. The idea of the optical stranger was one that was re-enforced by La Gazette de France in 1839, as they declared the invention of photography upsets all scientific theories of light and optics. The whole act of having ones picture taken was seen by many as a underground and bizarre concept, and the resulting exposures were oftentimes cited as too-real images (Mu nro 2009 p.168) and encouraged diverse reaction, ranging from that of excitement, to anxiety and fear, often leading to suggestions of magic (the transfiguration of the common photographer to the role of a magician or illusionist). Literature from the mid nineteenth century is prevalent with personal accounts of visits to local daguerreotype photographers studios and the wonders of photography. A letter, published in the quantify theme in 1852, where-by a middle aged man talks of his recent visit to a photography studio discusses how with a fluttering marrow he approaches the mysterious apartment. He is of course simply referring to a true early photographic studio setup, but these anxieties were very real for the ordinary person. Another letter, written by a women this time, was published in the Times newscomposition in 1854 describes the photographer disappearing into a mysterious printing press and alludes to some hocus pocus being indulged in out front he returns with t he exposed plate. The photos were comprehend as taking on a life of their own to a naive Victorian subject. The tone and lack of colour often make reactions of dismay, and many linked what were k straightway as the dark mysterious chamber to execution houses (Munro 2009). The small stiff chairs (encouraging the sitter to sit upright), complete with leg clamps. Further controversy was sown by the nature of daguerreotype. Many referred the way a photograph could only be viewed in certain light, and as Munro (2009 pg.172) puts it seemingly wasnt to be seen one moment, only to burst into view the next. Being photographed and indeed even seeing a photograph were whole new and exotic experiences. For many Victorians, photography was too-real, and a large part of the fear was simply a natural reaction to the newness of the communicative medium, and gall of a strange new and exotic process (Munro 2009 pg.169). The quoted realness of the photos could suggest a sense of fear relating to ju st how life like the photos were to a first time viewer, or suggest a much more deep routed fear related to magic and the unknown. It wasnt only the daguerreotype that achieved large graduated table success among the Victorian public. A large trade in what was known as carte de visite photographs soon came somewhat after their circulation became widespread, as highlighted in the Victorian periodical Once a Week. Carte de visite photographs were small paper portrait photographs which usually originated from the albumen process (which allowed for paper based prints to be make from the negative, meaning it was a simple process to produce copies). Once a Week (1862 pg 135) states Literary men have a invariable sale and their carte de visites were bought for every album. It becomes clear that collecting these small portrait photographs of the rich and famous was a popular pastime among the middle classes. It became so popular among the middle classes that it was often referred to as C ardomania (Once a Week 1862). We can clearly see that there was a need for photography, but these require arose after its introduction and were not in place before its conception. there was certainly something about early photography which caused an anxiety in the planetary public, but also fascinated them enough to endure it (even embrace it).It is now astray accepted that photography wasnt truly discovered until 1839, as it was then that Daguerre and Fox Talbot made their discoveries of early photographic processes, the daguerreotype and calotype respectively, and shared them with the world. Goldberg (1991) agrees that it was much previous when people began to realise a need and take interest in using light as a way of recording images, the need to preserve a moment accurately and without discrimination. Goldberg (1991 pg.10) goes on to state that passion was abroad to catch nature in a net, and that photography came to serve a much needed purpose, one that had been recognis ed much rather that its first conception. Indeed as early as the late 18th century, devices such as the camera obscura (optical device used mainly to aid drawing) and camera lucida (a piece of technology which allowed artists the ability to precisely record contours of landscape) were rife, and captured the warmness of professional and amateur artists alike. Henry Fox Talbot (1800-1877), sometimes referred to as the grandfather of Photography, was one of many people searching for an answer to the void that existed before the conception of photography, and was most interested in its ability to record nature accurately. Talbot states is his manual The Pencil of Nature (1844) that his photography should be thought of as photogenic drawing. Talbot (1844) goes on to say he pursued his development of the calotype photographic process mainly as a result of his poor ability as an artist. Lewis (1996 pg.16) statesThe canon of images to which we are so attached reveals as much and perhaps more about the intervening centuryTalbots photography, The impolite ingress for instance, appears to serve very little artistic purpose, and could merely be interpret as a mechanically accurate recording, something he was simply unequal to(p) of doing by hand. On the other it could be seen as an example of how photography could supplant the more traditional arts, an early example of the photographers ability to shape, to frame, and to set up reality how he saw fit. We may never know, as whilst we are able to appreciate early photographs, it is impossible to know the original context, how they were read, and indeed, what made them meaningful to the society of which they were a product. It is even more difficult to gauge the early intentions of photographic pioneers. Many widely believed that photography was going to hire a truth to society that had never been seen, its potential as a truth bearer, and an accurate recorder of history. Ernst Mach, an Austrian empiricist (ironica lly) stated How tranquil politics will be, and even the notorious critic Baudelaire (1859 pg. 297) stated photography could be considered a handmade of the arts and sciences although he goes on to say a very humble handmaid. Society became increasingly aware of its benefits as a scientific tool and embraced the possibilities this afforded with open arms A new found purpose perhaps, a commitment to relating to truth? As Goldberg (1981 pg. 16) statesThe engine was an extension of the muscle, the telegraph a superhuman voice, and the photograph an unblinking centre with a new outlook on history and knowledgeBaudelaire (1859) also suggests photography was merely a sign of the times, showing that links were made between the mechanical nature of photography and societies rising industrial heroism and reliance on machines. The unstoppable rise of industry so to speak. rise (2004) states a society will also invest and put time into developing new technologies in order to help satisfy an tecedently unseen social needs, and goes on to summarise (2004 pg. 12) that photography was a consequence, and not a cause of polish. I believe that photography was not a cause of change, but an answer to an unforeseen social need brought about by the emerging modern metropolitan lifestyle. It has become clear to me that there certainly was a need for photography, and the Victorians were fascinated with it, whether they loved it or detest it. As Bede (1855) begins is his satirical book Photographic Pleasure with a metaphor comparing men and womens scheme with photography to the same intrigue they hold for a human childThe ladies are enamoured of him The gentlemen evince their fancy by suggestions for his improvement, and by general attention to his welfare.All are fond of him everyone is declaring that he is the most beautiful baby yet born to Science.It is entirely executable that the reason it raised such widespread controversy, why it was so widely debated, and ultimately wh y it was so popular as an amateur spare-time activity or leisure pursuit was simply because the technology was still in its infancy. It was still new, and fresh. Artists were fearful of photography , not only because their jobs were endangered, but also their status as artists. A profession usually only available to a truly gifted few now had the potential to be available to anyone. These critics only served to fuel the anxieties that were common place among the general public, but, scorn this, the public did allow photography room to grow (albeit carefully, and with great caution and concern). It was a new technology which people needed time to come to terms with, time to understand, and time to flourish and co-exist peacefully with other more established art forms in the new, fast paced, and modern Victorian metropolitan lifestyle.BibliographyWELLZ, L. 2004. Photography A critical introduction. Oxford Routledge.CLARKE, G. 1997. The Photograph. Oxford Oxford University Press.BAUD ELAIRE, C. 1859. The Salon of 1859. Unknown.BRIGGS, A. 1998. A Victorian Portrait. London Cassell Publishers Limited.GOLDBERG, V. 1991. The Power of Photography How photographs changed our lives. New York Abbeville Publishing Group.BEARD, R. 1843. Advertisement Accessed 2rd celestial latitude 2009. operational from http//www.gettyimages.com/detail/73604552/Hulton-ArchiveGOLDBERG, V. 1981. Photography in Print Writings from 1816 to the present. New York University of New Mexico PressGREEN-LEWIS, J. 1996. Framing the Victorians. New York Cornell University Press.HEINZ, K. 1994. The Photographic Experience 1839-1914. papa Pennsylvania State University Press.MARIEN, M. 1997. Photography and its Critics. Cambridge Cambridge University Press. MUNRO, J. F. July 2009 The Optical Stranger Photographic anxieties in British periodical literature of the 1840s and 1850s. Journal of early popular visual culture 7(2) pp167-183.UNKNOWN. 1860 Punch magazine October 6th. p.140UNKNOWN. 1861 Punch ma gazine June 1st pg.221ARGO, F. 1930 Bulletin de la Socit Fran?aise de PhotographieNEWELL, B., and R. DOTY. 1962. The value of photography to the artist, 1839. The Bulletin of the George Eastman House of Photography online. 11 (6), Accessed December 2nd 2009, pp. 25-40. Available From http//image.eastmanhouse.org/files/GEH_1962_11_06.pdfDaumier, H. 1862. How the Famous Photographer Nadar Elevates Photography to the take of Art Accessed 3rd December 2009. Available from http//www.superstock.com/stock-photos-images/463-5227BEDE, C. 1855. Photographic Pleasures. London T McLean.UNKNOWN. 1862 Once a Week. UnknownTALBOT, H. F. 1844. The Open Door Accessed 4th December 2009. Available from http//cai.ucdavis.edu/waters-sites/aesthetic_movement/opendoorphoto.jpgBEARD, R. 1843. Advertisement Accessed 2rd December 2009. Available from http//www.gettyimages.com/detail/73604552/Hulton-ArchiveDaumier, H. 1862. How the Famous Photographer Nadar Elevates Photography to the Level of Art Accessed 3r d December 2009. Available from http//www.superstock.com/stock-photos-images/463-5227TALBOT, H. F. 1844. The Open Door Accessed 4th December 2009. Available from http//cai.ucdavis.edu/waters-sites/aesthetic_movement/opendoorphoto.jpg